- Is it a secure form;
- How much information is necessary;
- What is the response to an error.
Let's see how secure the forms are:
- helenahoeve.nl Not secure
- philips.nl Not secure
- postbus51.nl Secure
- vrom.nl Not secure, note: vrom.nl redirects the user to the postbus51.nl forms
- wehkamp.nl Secure
- wnf.nl Secure
Not bad, 3 out of 6 forms are secure. The ranking is:
- postbus51.nl, wehkamp.nl, wnf.nl
- helenahoeve.nl, philips.nl, vrom.nl
Okay, how much information is necessary:
- helenahoeve.nl 4, fields, 4 of them are required
- philips.nl 18 fields, 5 of them are required
- postbus51.nl 11 fields, 8 of them are required
- vrom.nl 4 fields, 3 of them are required
- wehkamp.nl 11 logical fields, none of them indicated as required (however 3 fields seems to be required)
- wnf.nl 16 logical fields, 8 of them are required
Ranking these websites based on the number of fields, give this overview:
So far, so good, what is the response on an error (e.g. e-mail address is a@b,c with a comma instead of a dot).
- helenahoeve.nl Error message that the e-mail address is not valid. You have to go back to the form to correct it.
- philips.nl Error message that the e-mail address is not valid. You are able to correct it directly.
- postbus51.nl Error message that the e-mail address is not valid. You are able to correct it directly.
- vrom.nl Error message that the e-mail address is not valid at the moment you make the mistake. You are able to correct it directly.
- wehkamp.nl Error message that the e-mail address is not valid. You are able to correct it directly.
- wnf.nl Error message that the e-mail address is not valid. You have to click on the OK button before you are able to correct it.
Ranking the forms gives this list:
- vrom.nl
- philips.nl, postbus51.nl, wehkamp.nl
- helenahoeve.nl, wnf.nl
Great, there are a few things I could improve:
- Make the forms secure;
- Detect the error as soon as possible;
- Let the user correct the error directly.
No comments:
Post a Comment