The scores for the webguidelines are:
- www.bol.com 36 points;
- www.ditzo.nl 28 points;
- www.eduhub.nl 40 points;
- www.hotels.nl 40 points;
- www.nos.nl 42 points.
The validation results of these sites are:
- www.bol.com Not valid, 111 errors;
- www.ditzo.nl Not valid, 390 errors;
- www.eduhub.nl Not valid, 16 errors;
- www.hotels.nl Valid XHTML Strict;
- www.nos.nl Valid XHTML Transitional.
Quality is not the same thing as usability.
The loadtime of these sites are:
The loadtime of these sites are:
- www.bol.com 4.9 seconds;
- www.ditzo.nl 25.7 seconds;
- www.eduhub.nl 1 second;
- www.hotels.nl 1.7 seconds;
- www.nos.nl 1.4 seconds.
So Ditzo is far to slow.
Lipperhey scores:
- www.bol.com technical 7.3, seo score 76%, popularity 10, overall score 8.3;
- www.ditzo.nl technical 6.7, seo score 74%, popularity 8, overall score 7.4;
- www.eduhub.nl technical 7.3, seo score 83%, popularity 8, overall score 7.9;
- www.hotels.nl technical 7.8, seo score 84%, popularity 9, overall score 8.4;
- www.nos.nl technical 6.6, seo score 71%, popularity 10, overall score 7.9;
How liguid are the designs (when does the horizontal scrollbar appear):
- www.bol.com 1 x "CTRL +";
- www.ditzo.nl 1 x "CTRL +";
- www.eduhub.nl 1 x "CTRL +";
- www.hotels.nl 1 x "CTRL +";
- www.nos.nl 1 x "CTRL +";
Is it easy to contact the organisation. Is there a real e-mail address or a contact form.
- www.bol.com e-mail address plus contact form;
- www.ditzo.nl no e-mail address, you have to make a phonecall;
- www.eduhub.nl e-mail address plus contact form;
- www.hotels.nl e-mail address, no contact form;
- www.nos.nl e-mail address, no contact form;
Overall I think that based on these tests www.hotels.nl should be the winnar. However you should score these websites on the following aspects:
- Navigation;
- Content;
- Design;
- Usability (Is the site easy to use).
In a next blog I will answer these questions.
No comments:
Post a Comment